data_mining:error_analysis

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
data_mining:error_analysis [2018/05/21 19:45] – [Working on most promising problems] phreazerdata_mining:error_analysis [2018/05/21 19:55] – [Misslabeled data] phreazer
Line 139: Line 139:
 Principles when fixing labels: Principles when fixing labels:
  
-Apply same process to dev and test set (same distribution) +  * Apply same process to dev and test set (same distribution) 
-Also see what examples algo got right (not only wrong) +  Also see what examples algo got right (not only wrong) 
-Train and dev/test data may come from different distribution (no problem if slightly different)+  Train and dev/test data may come from different distribution (no problem if slightly different) 
 + 
 +====== Missmatched train and dev/test set ====== 
 + 
 +  * 200.000 high qual pics 
 +  * 10.000 low qual blurry pics 
 + 
 +  * Option 1: Combine images, random shuffle in train/dev/test set 
 +    * Advantage: Same distribution 
 +    * Disadvantage: Lot of images come from high qual pics (most time is spend on optimizing for high qual pics) 
 +  * Option 2: 
 +    * Train set: 205.000 with high and low qual; Dev & Test: 2500 low quality 
 +    * Advantage: Optimizing right data 
 +    * Disadvantage: Train distr. is different than dev and test set 
  • data_mining/error_analysis.txt
  • Last modified: 2018/05/21 22:24
  • by phreazer